A selfie of me in front of a pond in the early evening, with the setting sun tinting the sky yellow. The far bank is dense forest with some trees turned various fall colors. I’m a bald, middle-aged, white man with a red and white beard. I’m wearing glasses with a metal top rim, a dark blue earbud in my left ear, and a black puffer jacket over a grey t-shirt.

Evening is now jacket weather in Boston, and while keeping warm I listened to talks for my #AcademicRunPlaylist!

First was a great conversation with Dionysios Pelekis on the problems with the EU’s industrial policy and potential fixes at the Digital Markets Research Hub https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmUAjOV15go

Next was an intriguing talk by Grigorios Chrysos on grounding diffusion models at the Simons Institute https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx47YnPmAeI

Next was an excellent Power at Work discussion on the most important stories in US labor with Seth Harris, Kate Andrias, Michael Sainato, and Alex Jacquez https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGaBtXEqyNk

Last was “Shattered Dreams, Infinite Hope” by Brandon M. Terry. This book, when at its best, is arguably the most important work of historically-inflected philosophy of the 21st century. In those sections, which is most of the book, Terry brilliantly dissects narratives and simplistic analyses of the Civil Rights movement, demonstrating how they fail to confront that history in its context and grapple with its revolutionary, imperfect philosophy and goals. He later reconnects these pieces in a concluding chapter that is nearly indescribable in its insightful, painful, moving, and hopeful analysis and call to action.

This is contrasted with chapters that are essentially digressions on inside baseball 21st century philosophy arguments, including an entire chapter on Kant (!) with barely any connective tissue to the Civil Rights era, and another one on Arendt with the same issue. If this were a textbook for a philosophy class these reviews would make sense, but that and later sections that referee arguments between philosophers that have had at best a very limited influence on society's understanding and interpretation of the Civil Rights movement should only be read if you're interested in those topics. Otherwise you should probably just skip these parts (they're easy to spot) and focus on the rest of this important text. Highly recommend https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674271289